i didn't see a difference in what they pointed out, i did see a difference in the smoothness of the shadows.
http://www.gameswire.net/co...
they need to grab more shots.
most people go by how many users are online using the service, more people means it's popular.
it's the same with the Ipod.
so the the answer is yes it is. one of xbox's top selling tittles makes 80 percent of it's sales off it's online campaign, which was established way far back to 2002.
they didn't use an extra disc on 360's version that's what happened.
something like that should already be like an unwritten rule, when making RPGs on that specific console.
"Bayonetta (PS3) – 93,000
Bayonetta (360) – 45,000
Hmmn.. No wonder Sega ported it.
;)"
Saga doesn't deserve that money, not with what kind of job they did.
you know, it's already bad as it is that these people took their hard earn yen and bought saga's version, when they are other ps3 titles to pick from. it would be even more dumber of them if these people had owned both consoles while they were doing their picking.
most women are a whole head shorter than men, but with bayonetta she seems to be in your face......or for some people breasts in your face :)
At (GWAVE)
-"No 360 game belongs on that list. Sorry, but we've seen gameplay of Alan Wake and Splinter Cell: Conviction."
was that a compliment or was that being OFFENSIVE, speak plainly please.
it's amazing how many immature gamers we have in the gamer zone.
it's all negative and it seems the gamers here already know what the whole world wants AND what xbox gamers want. the interesting factor is that we have fewer of THOSE gamers saying what they need, want, or would like to have.
it's like everyone here has now become a salesman or a sales annalist.
"and the 360 version...
4 compressed discs
Install required if you don't want to swap discs
Longer loading times
Sub HD gameplay and 720p Cutscenes
Massive Frame drops maybe even as low as 20FPS
Port
Worser looking version and lower res/compressed textures"
i say different, that E3 demo of 360's version showed nothing as you mentioned, including fps... and that demo was really early in development.
http://www.cinemablend.com/...
And EA said they maxed out the 360 a long time ago.
But you wouldn't mention that, would you?"
turn10: http://www.videogamer.com/n...
And Crytech said they maxed out the ps3 a long time ago.
...
The xbox 360 and ps3 both have power of near equal value, Give or take differences. for one the 360 has a built in hardware tesselator and the ps3 doesn't.
it's a feature that's developers have still yet to express in previous and in current titles.
http://ati.amd.com/develope...
ht...
(s8anicslayer)
bioshock and mass effect aren't made by the same people.
"If you look at games lately, there isn't a porting problem anymore"
no it's still going on.
yeah, what's taking mistwalker so long?
i could go for a BD2 or LO2....or something new, Ive been dieing to hear more of Uematu's musical pieces.
off topic.
i don't see how Official PlayStation magazine would be wrong, and besides what would be the point in making it 80,000 for characters?
http://i34.tinypic.com/2qxy...
http://i37.tinypic.com/2e15...
it's the same character number figures as before.
what everyone is looking at is texture differences, and it would be hard to di...
i don't think it's worth it.
i mean we've already seen how ps3 to 360 porting is so much better than vice versa, if EA does this they're going to end up with more unhappy customers.....and food for more 360 vs ps3ports debates.
(Shadow Haze501)
your avatar is open zone material.
mass effect1's was 25,000 for the heavy armor equipment.
under "How many polygons are used per character?"
http://mefaq.sendu.me.uk/FA...
those aren't bullshots, those are pics taken from the actual game running.
and this game isn't the first halo game to run at 720p, halo wars ran at 720p.
http://forum.beyond3d.com/s...